Mercury was shrinking for at least 3 billion years — and it still might be today

a black and white view of a part of a planet covered in craters A close-up image of Mercury's surface, taken by NASA's MESSENGER spacecraft on October 8, 2008.
A close-up image of Mercury's surface, taken by NASA's MESSENGER spacecraft on October 8, 2008. (Image credit: NASA/JPL)

Since the 1970s, when NASA's Mariner 10 mission reached Mercury, scientists have known that the planet is shrinking as its core cools down. But while it's estimated that thermal contraction started some 3 billion years ago, it hasn't been clear whether it's still happening.

But new research conducted by scientists from The Open University in the United Kingdom suggests there's been fairly recent shrinking-based tectonic activity on Mercury — as recently as 300 million years ago. And that indicates that Mercury might still be shrinking today.

In 1974, Mariner 10 photographed miles-high slopes on Mercury's surface called lobate scarps. These scarps develop when the interior of the planet contracts as it cools; the crust of the planet then develops "thrust faults" with the reduced surface area it can cover. (It's like an old apple that's drying out — the skin develops wrinkles as the flesh shrivels up.)

Related: Photos of Mercury from NASA's Messenger spacecraft

The Open University team analyzed more recent images, taken by the NASA MESSENGER spacecraft that orbited Mercury from 2011 to 2015, and discovered grabens, geological features where the ground depresses into a shallow valley along a fault. These typically occur when the crust is stretched, an indicator of the planet's shrinkage. 

Because these grabens are still visible and not obscured by impact craters or the ejected debris from them (it forms in a process called "impact gardening"), the team surmised the age of the grabens to be approximately 300 million years old. Older geologic features like the scarps are heavily altered by impact gardening.

While it's difficult to say if Mercury is still shrinking right now, 300 million years ago is fairly recent in geological terms, suggesting the possibility that its core may not have cooled completely and might still have some shrinking to do.

The grabens will be more closely observed on an upcoming joint mission between the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) called BepiColombo. The spacecraft launched in 2018 and is due to enter Mercury's orbit in late 2025, where it will collect new data.

The team's findings were published on Oct. 2 in the journal Nature.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Stefanie Waldek
Contributing writer

Space.com contributing writer Stefanie Waldek is a self-taught space nerd and aviation geek who is passionate about all things spaceflight and astronomy. With a background in travel and design journalism, as well as a Bachelor of Arts degree from New York University, she specializes in the budding space tourism industry and Earth-based astrotourism. In her free time, you can find her watching rocket launches or looking up at the stars, wondering what is out there. Learn more about her work at www.stefaniewaldek.com.

  • rod
    https://phys.org/news/2023-10-mercury-planet-smaller.html
    Widespread small grabens consistent with recent tectonism on Mercury, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-023-01281-5, 02-Oct-2023.

    "...The identified grabens are about 10 to 150 m deep, tens of kilometres in length and generally less than 1 km wide. We find that the grabens occur as secondary tectonic features on larger compressional tectonic structures, which indicates continued activity of the parent structure. We estimate that they must be ~300 million years old or younger; otherwise, impact gardening would have masked their signature by burial and infilling. The widespread distribution of grabens and their young age supports the continued activity of Mercury’s shortening structures into geologically recent times and is consistent with thermochemical evolution models for a slowly cooling planetary interior and prolonged global contraction."

    Okay, our best foot forward now to show Mercury is at least 4.5 billion years old it seems. Perhaps Mercury younger in age or much more recent catastrophism in the solar system :)
    Reply
  • billslugg
    Dear Abby:

    "grabens...typically occur when the crust is stretched, an indicator of the planet's shrinkage."

    I understand that grabens occur when crust is stretched, but the whole premise here is that the crust is shrinking.

    Signed,
    Confused
    Reply
  • Helio
    billslugg said:
    Dear Abby:

    "grabens...typically occur when the crust is stretched, an indicator of the planet's shrinkage."

    I understand that grabens occur when crust is stretched, but the whole premise here is that the crust is shrinking.

    Signed,
    Confused
    Yeah, the stretching story seems a bit odd since a graben has two fault lines, where fracture due to stretching could be one fault line, I assume.

    The link below shows a likely lunar graben, and it is described as a region that sank.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rima_Ariadaeus
    Reply
  • billslugg
    That's not my point. The graben only occurs where the crust is stretching. On a shrinking planet with no plate tectonics there no place where the crust is stretching. It's impossible. Something is not adding up.
    Reply
  • Helio
    billslugg said:
    That's not my point. The graben only occurs where the crust is stretching. On a shrinking planet with no plate tectonics there no place where the crust is stretching. It's impossible. Something is not adding up.
    Wouldn’t regional variations produce boundary stress with shrinkage?
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    I think they are looking at the "wrinkle" point of view. The surface area must decrease, but we have to keep that area. A wrinkle is the solution, it's misdirects or misaligned some of the area into wrinkles....some of the area is pointed up and some of the area is pointed down. Slopes and grabens.

    So a constant area stretched up and down to rest on reduced area. Wrinkled. The wrinkle is the stretch.

    That's the only way I can figure it.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    Yes, this makes sense. If we look at the peaks of the ridges, they have crevasses from shallow, localized spreading to accomodate folding.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    I would have thought that Mercury would have achieved temperature equilibrium long ago.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    Perhaps it goes thru a temperature cycle.
    Reply