Watch SpaceX Starship explode over Atlantic Ocean on Flight Test 7 (videos)

SpaceX knows how to put on a show.

The company launched the seventh flight test of its Starship megarocket this afternoon from its Starbase site in South Texas. The 403-foot-tall (123 meters) vehicle lifted off successfully and achieved stage separation. And its first-stage booster, called Super Heavy, made it back down to Starbase for a dramatic catch by its launch tower's "chopstick" arms.

But some eight minutes into the flight, SpaceX lost contact with the Starship upper stage, known as Ship. It's currently unknown what caused the problem, but one thing is certain: Ship went out with a bang.

a blue and white circle behind a silver trapezoid-shaped fin

Earth as seen from the upper stage of SpaceX's seventh Starship vehicle during its test flight on Jan. 16, 2025. The vehicle suffered an anomaly and exploded in Earth's atmosphere around 8.5 minutes after launch. (Image credit: SpaceX)

The 171-foot-tall (52 meters) spacecraft exploded over the Atlantic Ocean near the Turks and Caicos islands around 8.5 minutes after launch, creating a spectacular sky show witnessed by many people in the area.

And a fair few of these folks posted their photos and videos on X, the social media site owned by SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk.

Related: SpaceX catches Super Heavy booster on Starship Flight 7 test but loses upper stage (video, photos)

"Starship experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly during its ascent burn. Teams will continue to review data from today's flight test to better understand root cause. With a test like this, success comes from what we learn, and today’s flight will help us improve Starship’s reliability," SpaceX said via X this evening.

"Rapid unscheduled disassemblies" — SpaceX's favored term for explosions — are not uncommon during the development of new rockets.

And SpaceX certainly won't be deterred by today's results; the company is used to working fast, flying often and incorporating lessons learned on test flights into the next vehicle build. And there was a silver lining today — the Super Heavy "chopsticks" catch, which showcased SpaceX's planned recovery strategy for both the booster and Ship.

Today's catch was the second such snag for SpaceX, which first pulled off the feat in October on Starship Flight 5.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Brett Tingley
Managing Editor, Space.com

Brett is curious about emerging aerospace technologies, alternative launch concepts, military space developments and uncrewed aircraft systems. Brett's work has appeared on Scientific American, The War Zone, Popular Science, the History Channel, Science Discovery and more. Brett has English degrees from Clemson University and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. In his free time, Brett enjoys skywatching throughout the dark skies of the Appalachian mountains.

  • Viking
    And this is how we are going to get to the moon and Mars!
    Reply
  • JustMe1
    Precisely and job well done SpaceX!
    Reply
  • trailrider
    Was this a functional anomaly of did the Ship veer off course and the FTS blew it? Build some, test some, build some more. This was a largely new design of the ship, so that could have caused the RUD. Just have to wait for analysis. Wonder if the FAA will demand a complete investigation? Certainly SpaceX wants to determine the cause.
    Reply
  • JustMe1
    I don't believe the FAA will play politics anymore with SpaceX.
    Reply
  • Ghawtho1
    So, is everyone still cheering this? One foul-up after another. Cancel the contracts and take the work back to NASA.
    Reply
  • Viking
    JustMe1 said:
    I don't believe the FAA will play politics anymore with SpaceX.
    Glad I don’t live in their flight(?) path.
    Reply
  • George²
    JustMe1 said:
    I don't believe the FAA will play politics anymore with SpaceX.
    You what believe or not and reality moves on different paths.
    Reply