How the 'Great Filter' could explain why we haven't found intelligent aliens
But seriously, where is everybody?
"Where is everybody?" That famous phrase, uttered over lunch by eminent physicist Enrico Fermi, perfectly encapsulated what has since become known as the Fermi paradox: If life happened here on Earth and the universe tends to not do things only once, then life should also occur elsewhere. In fact, the universe should be teeming with advanced spacefaring civilizations.
Even when you account for every technological hurdle — limits in rocket technology, speed and life spans, as well as disease, warfare and anything else that could slow progress — the argument stays the same. Our galaxy is over 13 billion years old, which is more than enough time for spacefaring civilizations to spread throughout the Milky Way.
Indeed, we should see advanced civilizations everywhere — Dyson spheres, stellar engineering, artifacts littered across the solar system. But we don't. So where is everybody? Hence the paradox: Something in this line of reasoning has to give. We've gotten one, if not many or all, of these statements wrong. Which one?
first detailed in 1996 by economist Robin Hanson. The most distilled essence of the Great Filter argument is simple: Very few, if any, civilizations in the universe make it to the advanced spacefaring stage.
That's it. Fermi's paradox is broken in its assumption that intelligent spacefaring civilizations are common.
Considering that humanity is on the cusp of achieving regular spacefaring status, the Great Filter might seem a little ominous. But it doesn't have to be. The issue is that we don't know exactly when or where the filter actually happens. There are a lot of steps between "random planet with the right ingredients for life" and "vast interstellar empire."
Hanson broke it down into nine separate jumps that life requires to go from the little to the big leagues: the right star system, reproductive molecules, prokaryotic life, eukaryotic life, sexual reproduction, multicellular life, some vague category of intelligence (like using tools), advanced civilization with the potential for colonization and, finally, once all the pieces are in place, a gigantic galaxy-spanning explosion of life.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
So where's the bottleneck? Is it at the beginning, with life-ready systems hard to come by? Is it somewhere in the middle, where life never gets a start or just spends billions of years swimming around in oceans? Or is it toward the latter stages?
From what we can observe, the ingredients for life are incredibly common in the universe, so it's unlikely that the filter is there. As for the appearance of simple life, we have only one example to go on — but we do know that as soon as the conditions for life were possible on Earth, life appeared. This suggests life may be more common than we think.
As for the appearance of intelligence, we know that our kind of intelligence emerged only once in the history of life on Earth and that it took billions of years to show up. So again, from this one solitary data point, it seems that simple life may be common, but intelligence is rare. So maybe that's the filter: It's hard to evolve intelligent beings.
But if intelligence is common, then we have a lot to worry about. That means it's easy for intelligent species to arise on a planet, but something stops them from going galactic. That could be either the universe doing the job — say, a giant asteroid wiping them out — or, more likely, the species destroying itself. That's because any species that can travel into space must be able to harness incredible amounts of energy — energy that could very easily be turned to destructive purposes before that species has learned to live on other worlds.
The Great Filter is not the only potential solution to the Fermi paradox, and even within the context of the Great Filter, humanity's fate is not sealed. Perhaps galactic colonization is harder than we think or is boring for reasons we haven't realized yet. Maybe progress isn't linear, and our future technological development will focus us inward. Or perhaps we're already on the other side of the filter, we are one of the few species to make it to this stage, and the galaxy is essentially our cosmic playground.
But seriously, where is everybody?
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Paul M. Sutter is an astrophysicist at SUNY Stony Brook and the Flatiron Institute in New York City. Paul received his PhD in Physics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2011, and spent three years at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, followed by a research fellowship in Trieste, Italy, His research focuses on many diverse topics, from the emptiest regions of the universe to the earliest moments of the Big Bang to the hunt for the first stars. As an "Agent to the Stars," Paul has passionately engaged the public in science outreach for several years. He is the host of the popular "Ask a Spaceman!" podcast, author of "Your Place in the Universe" and "How to Die in Space" and he frequently appears on TV — including on The Weather Channel, for which he serves as Official Space Specialist.
-
Xoo I would argue that the missing requirement is energy at a lower level of technology: without fossil fuels, say, on Earth, there could have been no advanced technology. What are the chances of a random planet having the conditions to create coal or oil? I'd say pretty low, at which point, you'd be stuck around the technology of the 16-1700's.Reply -
Classical Motion Intelligent life is life that is required to create what is needs. Intelligent life is totally dumb life. Lack of knowledge is the only reason for creating. And only humans are born ignorant. All others are pre-programmed.Reply
We come into this world naked. We have nothing. No hide. No claws. No hooves for escape. No fangs. No camouflage. And most important of all, no knowledge. We are not sure of anything. Except that we can be eaten. And we feel pain.
We are creators. We have to be. We have to create and make everything we need.
Intelligence is the degree of creating. And the degree of choice. Recognizing a future.
We create concepts too, to replace that lack of knowledge. To make some kind of sense of this.
But so far, no one has seen the light for what it truly is. -
Hildy To me, two things stand out. Desire and Perspective.Reply
Desire - A galactic spanning civilization has to want to be galactic spanning. The only civilization we know of was built on conquest and colonialism. Surely other, more peaceful, civilizations arise in the cosmos who are content to stay in their own backyard. Besides, if you have the technology to create a generation ship, why launch it? Just use it as a space habitat in your own solar system.
Perspective - Spanning the galaxy would take multi-millennium year plans which seem unlikely when most species (ours and extraterrestrial) evolved from individuals whose planning started with "what's for dinner?" -
Moonwatcher
We have an example size of one. Us. It is hard, in fact impossible, to fathom any conclusions from a sample of one. Everything these "thinkers" conceive is based on thin air, mere conjecture at best.Admin said:One possible reason why we haven't found any intelligent life in the cosmos the Great Filter argument, which says that very few civilizations make it to the advanced spacefaring stage.
How the 'Great Filter' could explain why we haven't found intelligent aliens : Read more -
Gerold Perhaps “Where?” is the wrong question. It should be ‘When?”Reply
Our ability to navigate or communicate with the stars is commensurate with our ability to destroy ourselves. Intelligent life may be just a short flash-in-the-pan with vast periods of time between.
So, when is other life? Probably long before we were here and long after we’re gone. -
Dave Wells Fantastic article. Perhaps another obstacle is the problem with communication. We have only been sending out radio signals in the past 100 years, so it's possible that other advanced civilizations have been sending out signals but they have not reached us yet.Reply -
rod "But seriously, where is everybody?"Reply
Apparently they are not at these exoplanets documented now. So far, exoplanets documented today, none are confirmed with life on them, little or big, smart or not so smart :)
7367, https://exoplanet.eu/home/
5788, https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/index.html -
davidbsimmons
We are creators because that's what we were created to be. Life is not something that just happens when the ingredients are there. Life is given/created by the breath of the Creator.Classical Motion said:Intelligent life is life that is required to create what is needs. Intelligent life is totally dumb life. Lack of knowledge is the only reason for creating. And only humans are born ignorant. All others are pre-programmed.
We come into this world naked. We have nothing. No hide. No claws. No hooves for escape. No fangs. No camouflage. And most important of all, no knowledge. We are not sure of anything. Except that we can be eaten. And we feel pain.
We are creators. We have to be. We have to create and make everything we need.
Intelligence is the degree of creating. And the degree of choice. Recognizing a future.
We create concepts too, to replace that lack of knowledge. To make some kind of sense of this.
But so far, no one has seen the light for what it truly is. -
Bango_Skank
Well, the answer depends on how fast you're moving. At relativistic speeds, it might just take a year or 2 to make it across the galaxy. No telling what our protagonist explorers might find!Admin said:One possible reason why we haven't found any intelligent life in the cosmos the Great Filter argument, which says that very few civilizations make it to the advanced spacefaring stage.
How the 'Great Filter' could explain why we haven't found intelligent aliens : Read more