Humans will soon be able to mine on the moon. But should we? 4 questions to consider
By the end of this decade, nations and private companies may well be mining the surface of the moon.
This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
By the end of this decade, nations and private companies may well be mining the surface of the moon.
But as space becomes accessible to more nations and corporations, we need to stop and ask ourselves what commercial activities we want to allow, including on the moon.
Now is the time to create the rules and regulations that will protect humanity’s shared future in space and ensure the moon remains a symbol and inspiration for generations to come.
NASA sees lunar mining trial within the next decade (Reuters). https://t.co/90iyLQqlTk pic.twitter.com/ZXrqbbbnyyJune 28, 2023
1. Why mine the moon?
China is also on a similar trajectory.
All of this has set in motion a new lunar race with private companies competing to figure out how to extract the moon's resources, potentially selling it back to governments in a cosmic supply chain.
Currently, all supplies for space exploration are shipped from Earth, making essentials like water and fuel eye-wateringly expensive.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
By the time a single liter of water reaches the moon, its cost beats that of gold.
But by converting water ice on the moon into hydrogen and oxygen, we can refuel spacecraft on-site. This could make deeper space journeys, especially to Mars, far more feasible.
The moon’s wealth of rare Earth metals, essential for technologies like smartphones, also means lunar mining could ease the strain on Earth’s dwindling reserves.
Private companies might beat space agencies to the punch; a startup could be mining the moon before NASA lands its next astronaut.
Intuitive Machines’ stock soars as company preps second moon mission for early 2025 https://t.co/ARo16h8PYQNovember 15, 2024
2. Could mining change how we see the moon from Earth?
When material is extracted from the moon, dust gets kicked up. Without an atmosphere to slow it down, this lunar dust can travel vast distances.
That surface material is "space weathered" and duller than the more reflective material beneath. Disturbing the lunar dust means some patches of the moon may appear brighter where the dust has been kicked up, while other patches may appear more dull if dust resettles on top.
Even small-scale operations might disturb enough dust to create visible changes over time.
Managing lunar dust will be a crucial factor in ensuring sustainable and minimally disruptive mining practices.
3. Who owns the moon?
The Outer Space Treaty (1967) makes it clear no nation can claim to "own" the moon (or any celestial body).
However, it is less clear whether a company extracting resources from the moon violates this non-appropriation clause.
Two later agreements take up this issue.
The 1979 Moon Treaty claims the moon and its natural resources as “common heritage of mankind”. This is often interpreted as an explicit ban on commercial lunar mining.
The 2020 Artemis Accords, however, allow for mining while reaffirming the Outer Space Treaty’s rejection of any claims of ownership over the moon itself.
The Outer Space Treaty also notes the exploration of space should benefit everyone on Earth, not just the wealthier nations and corporations able to get there.
When it comes to resource extraction, some argue this means all nations should share in the bounty of any future lunar mining endeavor.
Related: NASA awards $500,000 to develop moon-mining tech
4. What would miners' lives be like on the moon?
Imagine you’ve worked 12 hours straight in hot and dirty conditions. You are dehydrated, hungry and overwhelmed. Some of your co-workers have collapsed or been injured due to exhaustion. You all wish you could just get another job with good safety standards, fair pay and reasonable hours. But you can’t. You’re stuck in space.
This dystopian vision highlights the potential dangers of rushing into lunar mining without addressing the risks to workers.
Working in low gravity conditions brings health hazards. Lunar miners are more likely to suffer:
- Bone and muscle loss
- Osteoporosis
- Renal and cardiovascular damage, and
- Impaired immunity.
Exposure to cosmic radiation not only carries an increased risk of various cancers but can also affect fertility.
Lunar miners will also face prolonged isolation and intense psychological stress. We’ll need good laws and guidelines to protect the health and wellbeing of the space workforce.
Regulatory bodies to enforce worker rights and safety standards will be far away on Earth. Miners may be left with little recourse if asked to work unreasonable hours in unsafe conditions.
British astrobiologist Charles S. Cockell claims this makes space “tyranny-prone.” Powerful individuals could, he argues, be able to abuse people who have nowhere else to go.
The moon holds incredible promise as a stepping stone for human exploration and a potential source of resources to sustain life on Earth and beyond.
But history has shown us the consequences of unchecked exploitation. Before we mine the moon, we must establish robust regulations that prioritize fairness, safety and human rights.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
-
Jim Franklin
That is one of the worst Op-Eds I have read in a long time. It is anti capitalist dogma that wants to hold human progress back because the little willy massive egos on the left want to control all of humaity, and if we start going off world, they lose that control.Admin said:By the end of this decade, nations and private companies may well be mining the surface of the Moon.
Humans will soon be able to mine on the moon. But should we? 4 questions to consider : Read more
It is clear that nations will put regulations in place, for example, a company employing British workers would still be covered by the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1989, as well as all the legislations that falls under these umbrella acts. International Law ceeds jurisdiction where abuses occur in International waters, and the Moon would certianly not fall under any given nation state, thus, legal action would be, well, legal.
This is not to say that other regulations should not be put in placve, but the problem you have is enforcement. Unless there was a Supranational Governing body in control on the Moon itself, or any other body, then the enforcement of any legislation from anywhere is all but impossible. -
Galacsi Good reply by Jim Franklin. I will add that there will be probably no "miners" on the moon. The mining industry will be highly automated because of the cost of using human labor on the Moon, and also because robotics progress every day. And if some dust is disturbed upon the surface and some bright patches appear.Reply -
Unclear Engineer This article tends toward over-regulation "for the good of all" to the point where the entities that try to comply may simply be unable to compete with those who will not comply.Reply
It will be hard enough to get moon reserves back to Earth at a price-point that makes them competitive. Adding something like a "for the good of all" tax on top of the actual costs, so that the "profits" are shared by other nations that are not spending their money and citizens to obtain those resources, could easily make for losses instead of profits from lunar mining ventures.
And the other use of lunar resources - to expand space travel further, is more likely and also harder to claim "benefits all".
I think that the opportunities basically belong to those who expend the efforts to obtain them. If some countries want to become involved without developing their own launch systems and other technologies, that seems fair on a "share" basis for the profits if they contribute to covering the costs. But, a top-off tax, payable to everybody regardless of contribution, seems likely to kill the opportunities for whoever can be forced to pay it, while expanding the opportunities for others who can avoid that tax. -
orsobubu
where did you learn that anti capitalists wants hold back the progress? exactly the opposite, capitalism can manage no more the huge productivity allowed by new technologies, requiring a resource-based new structural system of production, and, consequently, a new set of superstructural ideologies. Capitalism is limited between the scilla and cariddi of inflation and deflation, and suffers of the fatal bugs of overproduction and fall of profit rate, and in order to survive, it evolved in imperialism, which is its political envelope since the beginning of xx century: you know which were the horrendous consequencies. And the proof is exactly what is said by Galacsi, probably robots are going to work on planets instead of humans, and it is well known that machines, per se, on average, cannot produce any profit at all. Capitalism cannot produce enough capitals to reach for the stars.Jim Franklin said:That is one of the worst Op-Eds I have read in a long time. It is anti capitalist dogma that wants to hold human progress back because the little willy massive egos on the left want to control all of humaity, and if we start going off world, they lose that control.
It is clear that nations will put regulations in place, for example, a company employing British workers would still be covered by the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1989, as well as all the legislations that falls under these umbrella acts. International Law ceeds jurisdiction where abuses occur in International waters, and the Moon would certianly not fall under any given nation state, thus, legal action would be, well, legal.
This is not to say that other regulations should not be put in placve, but the problem you have is enforcement. Unless there was a Supranational Governing body in control on the Moon itself, or any other body, then the enforcement of any legislation from anywhere is all but impossible.