data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ff6d/7ff6d4d869e57b81c7653b35a084c9b3d4f6cbfe" alt="Expert Voices"
I want to believe — but yet another massive search for alien technosignatures just turned up nothing
Hunting for alien civilizations isn't a matter of just waiting around for them to show up; it's the business of combing through enormous volumes of data to look for peculiar signals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54dbe/54dbef1f8e09de97ee842e333edfae6b5488872c" alt="a large radio dish under a starry sky"
Hunting for alien civilizations isn't a matter of just waiting around for them to show up; it's the business of combing through enormous volumes of data to look for peculiar signals. The good news is that astronomers have developed an efficient method for doing exactly this. The bad news is that they haven't found anything … yet.
It seems like a somewhat reasonable assumption that if other civilizations are out there in the universe, eventually they will discover how to emit powerful radio broadcasts. Radio waves are capable of traversing great interstellar distances, so they make a great calling card. This is the foundational assumption for the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). Strange radio signals might be a sign of an artificial transmission from an alien species.
But our Milky Way galaxy is swimming in radio emissions of all sorts, from exploding stars to the vibrational hum of the galaxy's magnetic field. Plus, humanity has developed a particular fondness for radio transmissions, so any radio search for aliens must deal with enormous quantities of human-caused signals.
Previous SETI searches have scanned large areas of the sky and flagged anything interesting that popped up. Then, researchers have combed through the flagged results by hand, searching for signs of artificial transmission while ruling out potential causes of human-made interference.
Previous SETI searches have also come up totally empty — which isn't a big surprise, since this semimanual technique limits how much data any one research team can process.
Enter COSMIC, the Commensal Open-source Multi-mode Interferometric Cluster. COSMIC is a computer and software system that piggybacks on that of the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array, the iconic radio array located in the desert of New Mexico.
COSMIC is designed to automate the process of SETI searches as much as possible. By combining fast processing and a series of restrictive filters, the system searches signal after signal, deciding if it's likely to be artificial and, if it is, determining if it matches the signature of a known terrestrial source.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
In particular, COSMIC searches for radio signals that are very tightly focused, suggesting that they come from a very small source, like a planetary surface. Next, it looks for Doppler shifting of that radio signal. If the signal comes from a planet, the motion of the planet will either redshift or blueshift the signal, depending on whether the planet is moving away from or toward us when the signal was emitted. If the system finds a signal matching these properties, it is flagged and advanced to the next stage of filtering.
Related: How AI is helping us search the universe for alien technosignatures
Next, the astronomers behind COSMIC know the properties of terrestrial radio emission. This unwanted artificial emission follows particular statistical properties. If the flagged signal of interest matches those properties, the signal is rejected. Any remaining signals are then flagged for further review.
The COSMIC system is a part of the VLA Sky Survey, which completed a scan of roughly 82% of the Northern Hemisphere's sky. All told, the COSMIC system analyzed over 950,000 individual pointings of the telescope. Although the system initially flagged thousands of potentially interesting signals, none survived all of the filtering steps.
In other words, a deep radio search of a good chunk of the Northern Hemisphere found no artificial radio signals.
Although this is initially discouraging, this result still represents an important advance in our search for alien life. We can use this data to narrow down the probabilities of life appearing on any one planet, and we now have a valuable tool for collecting and processing data in future surveys, which might turn up something much more interesting.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Paul M. Sutter is an astrophysicist at SUNY Stony Brook and the Flatiron Institute in New York City. Paul received his PhD in Physics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2011, and spent three years at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, followed by a research fellowship in Trieste, Italy, His research focuses on many diverse topics, from the emptiest regions of the universe to the earliest moments of the Big Bang to the hunt for the first stars. As an "Agent to the Stars," Paul has passionately engaged the public in science outreach for several years. He is the host of the popular "Ask a Spaceman!" podcast, author of "Your Place in the Universe" and "How to Die in Space" and he frequently appears on TV — including on The Weather Channel, for which he serves as Official Space Specialist.
-
ChrisA Negative results are still "Good Science".Reply
What we are learning or have learned is that technological civilizations are at least VERY rare. As we observe more and more in the coming decades we will be able to refine this and say "'very rare" with greater precision. Perhaps we will learn the number is "one per galaxy, on average". or whatever the number is.
Then the theorists can explain why the number is so low. My guess is that the transition from primitive to modern human intelligence required a statistically improbable event. That is a very rare genetic mutation that happened coincidently with a population bottleneck. The universe might be filled with "people" who can use a rock as a hammer and build a fire but only one in a million of them goes on to create agriculture and written language. THis is my guess. But see, this is the way science works, we observe that technology is extremely rare and then try to explain why and they have to find ways to test our explanations.
So we actually have learned a LOT from SETI. It is telling us that we must be the result of some very rare coincidence. What was it? -
bolide Logically, this resembles a certain retort to someone who complains that God didn't answer their prayers: "Yes, He did--and the answer was No."Reply -
rod The exoplanet sites, I am still waiting for life to be confirmed on any of them. NASA or exoplanet.eu sites.Reply
https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/index.html, https://exoplanet.eu/home/
Looking at the exoplanet masses at .eu site, 104 are 2 or less earth masses. Example, AU Mic, all 7 of TRAPPIST-1 system, or others like tau Cet. Apparently we are not finding ET phoning home :) Other reports based upon the assumption of abiogenesis for the origin of life, our galaxy should contain many exoplanets with ET like life phoning home perhaps :)
Does planetary evolution favor human-like life? Study ups odds we're not alone, https://phys.org/news/2025-02-planetary-evolution-favor-human-life.html
"The model, which upends the decades-old "hard steps" theory that intelligent life was an incredibly improbable event, suggests that maybe it wasn't all that hard or improbable. A team of researchers at Penn State, who led the work, said the new interpretation of humanity's origin increases the probability of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe." -
ChrisA
Yes. Both are looking for confirmation of a belief that is not based on reason. So many people want Star Trek to be true or for there really to be gods living on Mt Olympus.bolide said:Logically, this resembles a certain retort to someone who complains that God didn't answer their prayers: "Yes, He did--and the answer was No."
My argument is that SETI is a real science because it has returned real data. We now know a lot more about the universe. We know technological societies are at the most very rare. 70 years ago this was still an open question and now it is much more resolved. That is actual science