A sprinkling of cosmic dust may have helped kick-start life on Earth

Earth is an ocean planet, as this image from NASA's Terra satellite shows.
Earth is an ocean planet, as this image from NASA's Terra satellite shows. (Image credit: NASA image by Robert Simmon and Marit Jentoft-Nilsen, based on MODIS data)

Cosmic dust may have helped to kick-start life on Earth, new research suggests. The findings challenge a widely held assumption that this was not a plausible explanation.

The origin of life on Earth has long remained a mystery. Many theories suggest that life emerged from "prebiotic chemistry," in which organic compounds formed and repeatedly self-organized until life as we know it developed.

However, scientists have noted that the rocks that make up Earth's surface are relatively deficient in reactive and soluble forms of the essential elements needed for this prebiotic process, such as phosphorus, sulfur, nitrogen and carbon.

In fact, life on Earth is engaged in "fierce competition" for the limited reservoirs of these elements, scientists wrote in a paper published in the journal Nature Astronomy earlier this year.

Related: Earth may have had all the elements needed for life all along, contrary to meteorite origin theories

So how could life have evolved under such conditions?

The prevailing theory is that the ingredients necessary for life might have been delivered to Earth. However, it remains unclear how these materials could have reached our planet's surface without being destroyed in the process.

In the Nature Astronomy study, the scientists investigated whether fine-grained "cosmic dust" could provide an answer. This granular material is produced in space by the collisions of asteroids or the vaporization and disintegration of comets as they move around the solar system.

"In contrast to larger objects, the flux of cosmic dust to Earth is essentially constant on yearly timescales," they wrote. "Moreover, some fraction of cosmic dust grains pass relatively gently through the Earth's atmosphere, thereby retaining a greater fraction of primitive" elements than large impactors do.

The Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) satellite captured its first view of the entire sunlit side of Earth from one million miles away on July 6, 2015. (Image credit: NASA)

Despite being a plausible delivery mechanism, this material is rarely considered in prebiotic theories because it spreads over a large area, perhaps making it less noticeable or harder to study in high enough concentrations, the team said. But concentrated cosmic-dust deposits do form on Earth today through normal sedimentary processes.

"There are many planetary processes that can concentrate fine-grained materials from across large surface areas to form concentrated deposits," the team wrote. For example, wind can blow dust and small particles into specific areas to create sand dunes. Rivers and streams transport and deposit fine sediments to form beaches. Glaciers move and deposit debris, leading to the formation of moraines. Each of these processes gathers and concentrates materials in particular locations. 

Using astrophysical simulations and geological models, the team sought to quantify the flux and composition of cosmic dust that might have accreted on Earth's surface during the first 500 million years following an event known as the moon-forming impact — a theory that Earth's moon formed during a collision between Earth and a Mars-size object. These types of collisions were common during the formation of the solar system.

The numerical models considered dust from the Jupiter family of comets and asteroids. After comparing the results to estimates of the present-day accretion on Earth, the team found that the total accretion of cosmic dust on early Earth may have been 100- to 10,000-fold higher than that observed today.

The model was also used to predict the proportion of dust within unconsolidated sediments deposited during a specific geological period. They considered a range of appropriate environments, including glacial surfaces, hot deserts and deep-sea sediments. To confirm their results, the team compared them to known measurements of these environments on Earth today.

The team found that cosmic dust is a small part of deep-sea sediments, even at the highest rates predicted by the model. However, in desert and glacial areas, cosmic dust could make up more than 50% of the sediments. The highest concentrations, over 80%, would be in areas where glaciers are melting, in sediments like those found in cryoconite holes — holes in a glacier's surface that form when wind carries sediment onto the glacier — just as they contain the highest reported levels of cosmic dust today.

Antarctic-like ice sheets that host cryoconite sediments with high levels of cosmic dust, along with proglacial lakes, seem to provide an excellent environment to support the early stages of life. They also can interact with other similar environments over time, similar to how streams can merge, the researchers suggested.

Taken together, the results offer an intriguing challenge to the widely held assumption that cosmic dust is incapable of kick-starting life on Earth.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Victoria Corless
Contributing Writer

A chemist turned science writer, Victoria Corless completed her Ph.D. in organic synthesis at the University of Toronto and, ever the cliché, realized lab work was not something she wanted to do for the rest of her days. After dabbling in science writing and a brief stint as a medical writer, Victoria joined Wiley’s Advanced Science News where she works as an editor and writer. On the side, she freelances for various outlets, including Research2Reality and Chemistry World.

  • rod
    "Using astrophysical simulations and geological models, the team sought to quantify the flux and composition of cosmic dust that might have accreted on Earth's surface during the first 500 million years following an event known as the moon-forming impact — a theory that Earth's moon formed during a collision between Earth and a Mars-size object. These types of collisions were common during the formation of the solar system."

    My observation. This is very different than Charles Darwin warm little pond in his letter of 1871. We have much more catastrophism now for the origin of life on Earth via abiogenesis using astronomy :) Still waiting to observe abiogenesis create life in nature and confirm among the more than 7,000 exoplanets documented now. https://exoplanet.eu/home/
    Reply