2 space telescope designs will battle it out to become NASA's next cosmic imager

a silver space telescope with gold mirror floats in sapce.
An artist’s concept of the PRIMA mission. (Image credit: NASA/JPL–Caltech/ESO/S. Brunier)

The teams behind two potential new space telescopes have embarked on their final design studies as they go head-to-head to see which will be the first of NASA’s new "Probe" class of mission.

PRIMA, the Probe far-Infrared Mission for Astrophysics, will study the universe at the longest of infrared wavelengths, bridging the gap between what the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) can see in the near- and mid-infrared, and what radio telescopes observe. On Nov. 8, the international PRIMA team — led by Jason Glenn of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center and including researchers from the US and Europe — convened at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California for a workshop to kick-off the design study.

The mission PRIMA is going up against is AXIS, the Advanced X-ray Imaging Satellite. Led by Chris Reynolds of the University of Maryland, AXIS would be designed to study black holes within distant galaxies in the early universe discovered by the JWST, and probe how active black holes and bursts of supernova explosions can affect the galaxies around them. The mission would also watch for "transients" – flashes of X-ray light that could be from exploding stars, gamma-ray bursts, glitches on magnetic neutron stars or sporadic accretion onto black holes.

Both teams have until 2026 to make their case, having each been awarded $5 million to do so, and the selected mission will fly in 2032.

Related: 'Flame-throwing' Guitar Nebula's concert caught by Hubble and Chandra space telescopes (video)

PRIMA is being supported by the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Heidelberg, Germany, where researchers will build vital components for the mission, including two high-precision, actively controlled beam-steering mirrors called "two-axis focal-plane choppers." These are able to steer the light entering the telescope and reflecting off its 1.8-meter (5.9 feet) aluminum mirror toward the sensors in PRIMA's two instruments, allowing high-resolution views of any part of the sky in the 'scope's field of view.

Those two instruments are PRIMAger (PRIMA imager) and FIRESS (Far-Infrared Enhanced Survey Spectrometer), which will observe light at wavelengths between 24 and 261 microns (the JWST can see up to 28.3 microns, which is the far end of the mid-infrared band). PRIMA would be 100 times more sensitive than its precursor missions, NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope and the European Space Agency's Herschel Space Observatory, and the team behind it claim that it will have the ability to measure in detail the chemical composition of planet-forming disks around young stars.

Because far-infrared light can be easily drowned out by thermal emission from the telescope itself, PRIMA needs to be cryogenically cooled down to –269 degrees Celsius (–452 degrees Fahrenheit), which is just four degrees above absolute zero. Yet this comes with an advantage; the instruments can use superconducting sensors called Kinetic Inductance Detectors, or KIDs, which count individual photons as well as record their energy and arrival time exactly. Superconductors are exactly what they sound like: materials that are extra-efficient at conducting electrons and which utilize quantum effects, but, in order to operate, they must be at low temperature.

With concerns about the longevity of the Chandra X-ray Observatory in NASA's budget, AXIS would be a timely mission to fill any gap if Chandra is forced to shut down. AXIS would function in unison with the JWST to probe black holes that existed over 13 billion years ago. On the other hand, PRIMA covers a wavelength band that there currently is no coverage of — far-infrared astronomy can only be done in space, since Earth's heat swamps it out — and it could also work in unison with the JWST to examine star- and planet-forming regions in the universe. It's a tough decision that NASA has to make.

The opportunity for both missions came along thanks to the recommendation of the recent astrophysics decadal survey that recognized that there could be a delay of several decades for the next generation of "great observatories" to replace Hubble, Chandra and even the JWST. To help fill the gap, the decadal survey proposed a new class of medium-scale mission, with a budget capped at $1 billion (not including launch), which could blast off in the 2030s without too much development time required. These are the Probe-class missions and they will help create opportunities that might never have happened if NASA threw all its eggs into the basket of the next multi-billion dollar project like the JWST.

Whichever mission is selected, it will do valuable work and teach us new things about the cosmos.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Keith Cooper
Contributing writer

Keith Cooper is a freelance science journalist and editor in the United Kingdom, and has a degree in physics and astrophysics from the University of Manchester. He's the author of "The Contact Paradox: Challenging Our Assumptions in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence" (Bloomsbury Sigma, 2020) and has written articles on astronomy, space, physics and astrobiology for a multitude of magazines and websites.

  • Unclear Engineer
    It is a shame that we are not going to fund both of these missions.
    Reply
  • fj.torres
    Hopefully they'll design with STARSHIP in mind.
    It should save complexity and money.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    In addition, hopefully they will be designed for final assembly and testing in LEO before being sent to their mission locations. That would allow for substantially increased dimensions without the complexity of auto-unfolding mechanisms, which create cost and reliability issues.
    Reply
  • skynr13
    Unclear Engineer said:
    In addition, hopefully they will be designed for final assembly and testing in LEO before being sent to their mission locations. That would allow for substantially increased dimensions without the complexity of auto-unfolding mechanisms, which create cost and reliability issues.
    But it would also create extra cost trying to assemble them in outer space as well as the reliability of something that wasn't assembled on Earth and can't be reconfigured by hand before use. So, it's a 50/50 proposition there if not worse with trying to assemble and test them in space.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    I don't think it is close to 50%-50%.

    The ability to put prefab pieces into place in space and check that the full assembly functions properly before sending it to its mission location avoids all sorts of complexity for deploying things like solar panels, solar thermal shields, and mirrors that need to be in perfect alignment after unfolding from the shape needed to fit inside a launch fairing.

    I think it would be both cheaper and more reliable for putting large telescopes into space.

    Remember, we aren't talking about assembly from small parts - we are talking about fitting together modules whose fit and function have already been tested on Earth, while avoiding the issues with having to have that happen automatically from a folded condition with no chance for correction is something hangs up for any reason.

    Yes, SpaceX StarShip will have much larger launch fairings. But, we are still going to want even larger telescopes.
    Reply
  • skynr13
    Unclear Engineer said:
    I don't think it is close to 50%-50%.

    The ability to put prefab pieces into place in space and check that the full assembly functions properly before sending it to its mission location avoids all sorts of complexity for deploying things like solar panels, solar thermal shields, and mirrors that need to be in perfect alignment after unfolding from the shape needed to fit inside a launch fairing.

    I think it would be both cheaper and more reliable for putting large telescopes into space.

    Remember, we aren't talking about assembly from small parts - we are talking about fitting together modules whose fit and function have already been tested on Earth, while avoiding the issues with having to have that happen automatically from a folded condition with no chance for correction is something hangs up for any reason.

    Yes, SpaceX StarShip will have much larger launch fairings. But, we are still going to want even larger telescopes.
    With today's solar panels that unfurl they'd be no problem with being attached before launch. The shields and mirrors I don't know. But if they have to be assembled in space, in order to do that you'd need a robot to be sent up with it and that is what I was thinking would be the extra cost. I can't wait for Starship to be operational!
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    You don't need robots to do LEO assembly tasks - we can already put humans there, and more easily as more orbital stations are developed along with various human launch capabilities.
    Reply
  • skynr13
    Unclear Engineer said:
    You don't need robots to do LEO assembly tasks - we can already put humans there, and more easily as more orbital stations are developed along with various human launch capabilities.
    Ok, so you mean send up a human or humans to assemble the satellite or telescope. But every time humans launch into space there is the risk of loss of life and that is probably why they assemble these things on the ground.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    Times are changing. LEO is about to become more populated with various human habitats with various missions. One of which will be making things in space. People are already doing "space walks" to fabricate things on the outside of the ISS. But, they are using antiquated EVA suits. Private companies are already making better suits for future projects.
    Reply
  • George²
    Unclear Engineer said:
    Times are changing. LEO is about to become more populated with various human habitats with various missions. One of which will be making things in space. People are already doing "space walks" to fabricate things on the outside of the ISS. But, they are using antiquated EVA suits. Private companies are already making better suits for future projects.
    Hmm, you seem to have missed article for how many satellites and mostly debris there are already in low and medium orbit. It is dangerous to live in these orbits. And billionaires usually don't like to risk their lives.
    Reply